Edwards v. Blackshear et al
| Drake A Edwards |
| Angela A Blackshear and Jami M Dawson |
| 3:2015cv00455 |
| December 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Sharon L. Ovington |
| Thomas M. Rose |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
DECISION AND ENTRY - The Report and Recommendations docketed on October 14, 2016 3 is ADOPTED in full, Plaintiff Drake A. Edward's Complaint and claims are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2), the Court certifies un der 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3) that Plaintiff's appeal from this Court, if any, would not be taken in good faith; and, the case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 11-4-2016. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
3
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 1) Plaintiff's Complaint be DISMISSED with prejudice; 2) The Court certify that Plaintiff's appeal from this Court, if any, would not be taken in good faith; and, 3)The case be terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 10/31/2016. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 10-14-16. (mcm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
