Thomas v. Progressive Casualty Insurance et al
| Charlotte S Thomas |
| Progressive Casualty Insurance and MetLife Insurance Company |
| 3:2015cv00456 |
| December 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Sharon L. Ovington |
| Walter H. Rice |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING MOTIONS TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANTS PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY (DOC.# 20 ) AND METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (DOC.# 21 ); PLAINTIFF CHARLOTTE S. THOMAS'S PRO SE AMENDED COMPLAINT(DOC. # 18 ) IS DISMIS SED WITH PREJUDICE; JUDGMENT SHALL ENTER IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF; TERMINATION ENTRY- For the foregoing reasons, Progressive and Metlife's Motions to Dismiss, Doc.# 20 ; Doc. # 21 ,are SUSTAINED. Plaintiff's Pro Se Amend ed Complaint, Doc. # 18 , is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Judgment shall enter in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff.The captioned case is hereby ordered terminated upon the docket records of theUnited States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton.. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 11/14/16. (kma)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
17
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING MOTIONS TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANTS PROGRESSIVE CASUAL TY INSURANCE COMPANY (DOC. # 3 ) AND METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (DOC. # 8 ); SAID MOTIONS ARE SUSTAINED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; CASE WILL REMAIN OPEN ON DOCKET FOR THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF ENTRY; PLAINTIFF MAY FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN THAT TIME; PROGRESSIVE'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S FILING ON APRIL 26, 2016 (DOC. # 15 ) IS OVERRULED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 7/11/16. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
