Greene v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Greene v. Commissioner of Social Security

Greene v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Ronald Greene
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	3:2016cv00046
Filed:	February 11, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Dayton Office
County:	MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge:	Sharon L. Ovington
Presiding Judge:	Walter H. Rice
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 10, 2017	Filing 18 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PARTREPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATEJUDGE (DOC. # 15 ); OBJECTIONS OF PLAINTIFF RONALD GREENE TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (DOC. # 16 ) ARE SUSTAINED IN PART AND OVERRULED IN PART; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, REVERSING THE COMMISSIONER'S DECISION THAT PLAINTIFF WAS NOT DISABLED AND, THEREFORE, NOT ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT, AND REMANDING THE CAPTIONED CAUSE TO THE COMMISSIONER, PURSUANT TO THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. §405(g), FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS OPINION; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 3/10/17. (pb)
February 2, 2017	Filing 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The ALJ's non-disability decision be affirmed; and the case be terminated on the Court's docket. Objections to R&R due by 2/16/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 2/2/2017. (lek)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 10, 2017

Filing 18 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PARTREPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATEJUDGE (DOC. # 15 ); OBJECTIONS OF PLAINTIFF RONALD GREENE TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (DOC. # 16 ) ARE SUSTAINED IN PART AND OVERRULED IN PART; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, REVERSING THE COMMISSIONER'S DECISION THAT PLAINTIFF WAS NOT DISABLED AND, THEREFORE, NOT ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT, AND REMANDING THE CAPTIONED CAUSE TO THE COMMISSIONER, PURSUANT TO THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. §405(g), FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS OPINION; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 3/10/17. (pb)

February 2, 2017

Filing 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The ALJ's non-disability decision be affirmed; and the case be terminated on the Court's docket. Objections to R&R due by 2/16/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 2/2/2017. (lek)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Greene v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Greene
Represented By:	Gary Marc Blumenthal
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By:	John J. Stark
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?