Greenlee v. Sandy's Towing and Recovery Inc. et al
| Kiel T Greenlee and Gloria J Greenlee |
| Sandy's Towing and Recovery Inc., Ted Durig, Doug Thoma, Brad Thoma, Ryan Templin, Dispatch Operator and Truck Operator |
| 3:2016cv00064 |
| February 22, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Michael R. Merz |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT- Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. The Clerk will ent er judgment dismissing the Complaint herein with prejudice. The Court hereby certifies to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would beobjectively frivolous and should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 1/9/17. re 67 , 72 . (kma)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
71
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL 70 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 11/15/2016. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
64
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - Because Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 57) is not properly supported under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c), it is DENIED without consideration of any of the othe r issues raised in the Motion. The Court notes that six weeks remain until the summary judgment filing deadline of December 15, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 11/2/2016. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
37
DECISION AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION - Having reconsidered its decision on the pre-judgment replevin request, the Court finds no manifest error of law and declines to change its decision. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 5/19/2016. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 15 WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 4/15/2016. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 5 Report and Recommendations - No objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations . Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 4 ) is denied without prejudice. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 3/15/2016. (srb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS- It is accordingly respectfully recommended that the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 4) be denied without prejudice to its renewal after Defendants have been served with process and had an opportunity to plead. Objections to R&R due by 3/14/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 2/25/2016. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
