Montgomery v. Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
| Roderick T Montgomery |
| Warden, Warren Correctional Institution |
| 3:2016cv00089 |
| March 12, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| WARREN |
| Michael R. Merz |
| Walter H. Rice |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING PETITIONER RODERICK T. MONTGOMERY'S OBJECTIONS (DOC. # 8 , 11 ) TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. # 7 ) AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. # 10 ) OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL R. MERZ; ADOPTING S AID REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE IN FULL; DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE MONTGOMERY'S PETITION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2254 FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY (DOC. # 1 ); MONTGOMERY IS DENIED A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; ANY APPEAL WOULD BE OBJECTIVELY FRIVOLOUS AND SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; JUDGMENT SHALL ENTER IN FAVOR OF RESPONDENT WARDEN, WARREN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AND AGAINST MONTGOMERY; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 12/29/16. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
10
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Having reconsidered the case in light of the Objections, the Magistrate Judge again respectfully recommends the Petition be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this co nclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 9/19/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 8/31/2016. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
7
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - It is respectfully recommended that the Petition here be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Co urt should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 9/1/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 8/15/2016. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Montgomery v. Warden, Warren Correctional Institution | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Roderick T Montgomery | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden, Warren Correctional Institution | |
| Represented By: | M Scott Criss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
