Fisk v. Dayton Police Department et al
| Robert Fisk |
| Dayton Police Department, Dayton Municipal Court, Wombold, Cartte and Colette E. Mooreman |
| 3:2016cv00118 |
| April 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Sharon L. Ovington |
| Thomas M. Rose |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Report and Recommendations docketed on June 6, 2017 22 is ADOPTED in full, Defendants' request for an Order dismissing this case [#21] is GRANTED; and the case is terminated on the Courts docket. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 6-30-2017. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
22
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 1) 21 Defendants' request for an Order dismissing this case be GRANTED; and 2) The case be terminated on the Court's docket. Objections to R&R due by 6/20/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 6-6-17. (mcm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER granting 14 Motion to Compel - Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSEon or before June 2, 2017why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 5/19/17. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
7
DECISION AND ENTRY VACATING ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, 4 , ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATESCHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE OVINGTON 3 , AND OVERRULING PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE CHIEF MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 5 . Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 8-24-2016. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
4
DECISON AND ENTRY ADOPTING the Report and Recommendations 3 in full; Plaintiff's claims against the Dayton Police Department, the Dayton Municipal Court, and Magistrate Moorman are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2 ), Plaintiff's excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment against Defendants Officers Wombold and Cartte are not dismissed, and the United States Marshal's Office are ORDERED to effect service upon Defendants Wombold and Cartte, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3), once it receives the required forms from the Clerk of Court. All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 7-13-2016. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
3
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Plaintiff's claims against the Dayton Police Department, the Dayton Municipal Court, and Magistrate Moorman be DISMISSED with prejudice; Plaintiff's excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment against Defen dants Officers Wombold and Cartte not be dismissed; and the United States Marshal's Office be ORDERED to effect service upon Defendants Wombold and Cartte, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3), once it receives the required forms from the Clerk of Cour t. All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. Objections to R&R due by 7/11/2016. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 6-24-16. (mcm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
