Vaughn v. Common Pleas Court of Montgomery County Ohio

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Vaughn v. Common Pleas Court of Montgomery County Ohio

Vaughn v. Common Pleas Court of Montgomery County Ohio

Plaintiff:	Grace Vaughn
Defendant:	Common Pleas Court of Montgomery County Ohio
Case Number:	3:2016cv00248
Filed:	June 17, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Dayton Office
County:	MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge:	Sharon L. Ovington
Presiding Judge:	Thomas M. Rose
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 21, 2016	Filing 6 ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS overruling Objections 5 - Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the Court CERTIFIES under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that Plaintiff's appeal, if an y, would not be taken in good faith; and the case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 10-21-2016. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
August 12, 2016	Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 1) Plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED; 2) The Court certify that Plaintiff's appeal, if any, would not be taken in good faith; and, 3) The case be terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 8/29/2016. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 8-12-16. (mcm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 21, 2016

Filing 6 ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS overruling Objections 5 - Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the Court CERTIFIES under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that Plaintiff's appeal, if an y, would not be taken in good faith; and the case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 10-21-2016. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

August 12, 2016

Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 1) Plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED; 2) The Court certify that Plaintiff's appeal, if any, would not be taken in good faith; and, 3) The case be terminated on the docket of this Court. Objections to R&R due by 8/29/2016. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 8-12-16. (mcm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vaughn v. Common Pleas Court of Montgomery County Ohio
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Grace Vaughn
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Common Pleas Court of Montgomery County Ohio
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?