Goldblum v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
| Keith Donald Goldblum |
| Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution |
| 3:2016cv00254 |
| June 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Michael R. Merz |
| Walter H. Rice |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING PETITIONER KEITH DONALD GOLDBLUM'S OBJECTIONS (DOC. # 24 , 27 ) TO THE REPORT ANDRECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. # 16 ) AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. # 26 ) OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL R. MERZ; ADOPTING SAID REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE IN FULL; OVERRULING GOLDBLUM'S MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING (DOC. # 24 ) AND DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE GOLDBLUM'S PETITION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2254 FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY (DOC. # 1 ); GOLDBLUM ISDENIED A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; ANY APPEAL WOULD BE OBJECTIVELY FRIVOLOUS AND SHOULD NOT BE PERMITIED TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; JUDGMENT SHALL ENTER IN FAVOR OF RESPONDENT WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AND AGAINST GOLDBLUM; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 11/30/17. (kma)
|
|
Filing
26
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Magistrate Judge again respectfully recommends the Petition be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Petitioner has not presented any objection specific to the recommendation that a certificate of appealability be DENIED nor has any doubt on that score arisen sua sponte. Therefore, because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 5/30/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 5/16/2017. (kpf)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER TO PAY FILING FEE; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Petitioner has never paid the filing fee in this case, nor sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Considering that he is now represented by retained counsel, he is ORDERED to pay the filing fee ($5.00) forthwith. It is also respectfully recommended that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 4/20/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 4/6/2017. (kpf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Goldblum v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Keith Donald Goldblum | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution | |
| Represented By: | M Scott Criss |
| Represented By: | Hilda Rosenberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
