Venegas et al v. Wright State University et al

Plaintiff: Diego Venegas and Marc Sodini
Defendant: Wright State University and Chris Taylor
Case Number: 3:2016cv00377
Filed: August 31, 2016
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Office: Dayton Office
County: GREENE
Presiding Judge: Walter H. Rice
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Education
Cause of Action: 28:1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 29, 2017 15 Opinion or Order of the Court CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Signed on 11/29/17. (kma)
August 21, 2017 11 Opinion or Order of the Court DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANTS WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY AND CHRIS TAYLOR (DOC # 5 ) AS TO CLAIMS ONE THROUGH FOUR FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, SUSTAINING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STA TE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED (DOC. # 5 ) AS TO CLAIM FIVE, AND OVERRULING DEFENDANTS' MOTION AS TO CLAIM SIX, SUBJECT TO RENEWAL IF PLAINTIFFS CHOOSE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT; MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT OF PLAI NTIFFS DIEGO VENEGAS AND MARC SODINI (DOC # 7 ) IS OVERRULED, AS PLAINTIFFS HAVE NOT SET FORTH CLAIMS THAT WOULD SURVIVE A MOTION TO DISMISS; PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS TWO THROUGH FIVE ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, AND JUDGMENT SHALL ULTIMATELY ENTER IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFFS ON THOSE CLAIMS; PLAINTIFFS MAY FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AS TO CLAIM ONE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE DAYS OF THIS ENTRY, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH HEREIN AND THE STRICTURES OF RULE 11 ; IF PLAINTIFFS FAIL TO FILE A VIABLE AMENDED CLAIM ONE, THEN THE COURT WILL DISMISS CLAIM SIX WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO REFILING IN A STATE COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 8/21/17. (pb) Modified on 8/21/2017 (pb).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Venegas et al v. Wright State University et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wright State University
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chris Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diego Venegas
Represented By: Mark Anthony Weiker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marc Sodini
Represented By: David Paul Williamson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?