Truman v. Commissioner of Social Security
||Commissioner of Social Security
||September 2, 2016
||US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
||Sharon L. Ovington
||Thomas M. Rose
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 9, 2017
DECISION AND ENTRY - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The Parties Joint Stipulation to Award Attorneys Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. #16) is accepted and the Commissioner shall pay Plaintiff=s attorney fees, costs, and expenses i n the total amount of $4150.00; 2. Counsel for the parties shall verify, within thirty days of this Decision and Entry, whether or not Plaintiff owes a pre-existing debt to the United States subject to offset. If no such pre-existing debt exists , Defendant shall pay the EAJA award directly to Plaintiffs counsel pursuant to the EAJA assignment duly signed by Plaintiff; and 3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 11/9/17. (pb)
|August 18, 2017
DECISION AND ENTRY - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The Commissioners non-disability finding is vacated; 2. No finding is made as to whether Plaintiff Manda Truman was under a disability within the meaning of the Social Security Act; 3. This matte r is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with this Decision and Entry; and 4. The case is terminated on the Courts docket. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 8/18/17. (pb)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?