Williams v. Ohio Department of Rehab and Correction, et al. et al
Melody L Williams |
Ohio Dept of Rehab and Corrections, Warden, Dayton Correctional Institution, Jenkins-Harris, Moore, Dulan and Terrence Griffin |
3:2016cv00384 |
September 7, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Dayton Office |
MONTGOMERY |
Sharon L. Ovington |
Thomas M. Rose |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 DECISION AND ENTRY - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiffs Motion for Extension of Time or Stay Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 35 ) is DENIED, in part, as to her request for a 60-day extension of time to respond; and 2. Pla intiff shall file a response, if any, by June 24, 2019 to the exhaustion contentions Defendants raise in their Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff is placed on notice that a failure to timely respond to this Order may result in the entry of sum mary judgment in Defendants favor and dismissal of her remaining claim. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 6/7/2019. (srb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 29 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 28 , Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend 25 is GRANTED and the case proceed only on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims regarding the alleged denial of medical and dental care, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 20 is DENIED as moot without prejudice to renewal and without prejudice to Defendants' option of filing a Motion for Summary Judgment accompanied by Plaintiff's medical records or other discovery materials. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 8-22-2018. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 1) 25 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend be GRANTED and the case proceed only on her Eighth Amendment claims regarding the alleged denial of medical and dental care; and 2) 20 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss be DENIED as moot without prejudice to renewal and without prejudice to Defendant' option of filing a Motion for Summary Judgment accompanied by Plaintiff's medical records or other discovery materials. Objections to R&R due by 8/16/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 8-2-18. (mcm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 16 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 -The Report and Recommendations docketed on August 7, 2017 15 is ADOPTED in full, Interested Party, The State of Ohio's Motion to Dismiss 9 is DENIED without prejudice to renewal; P laintiff's Motion to Withdraw Suit Against Defendants in Their Individual Capacities 12 is GRANTED as unopposed; Plaintiff's Motion for an Order directing the U.S. Marshal to Effect Service 12 is GRANTED; and the Clerk of Court is direc ted to immediately forward to the U.S. Marshal the forms required to effect service, and the U.S. Marshal is directed to forthwith effect service. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 8-22-2017. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 1) Interested Party, The State of Ohio's Motion to Dismiss 9 be DENIED without prejudice to renewal; 2) Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw Suit Against Defendant's in Their Individual Capacities 12 be GRANTE D as unopposed; 3) Plaintiff's Motion for an Order directing the U.S. Marshal to Effect Service 12 be GRANTED; and 4) The Clerk of Court be directed to immediately forward to the U.S. Marshal the forms required to effect service, and the U.S. Marshal be directed to forthwith effect service. Objections to R&R due by 8/21/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 8-7-17. (mcm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.