Dear v. Quantech Services, Inc. Short-term Disability Plan et al
Plaintiff: Deborah Dear
Defendant: Quantech Services, Inc. Short-term Disability Plan, Quantech Services, Inc. Long-Term Disability Plan and United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Case Number: 3:2016cv00448
Filed: October 24, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge: Walter H. Rice
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER UNSEALING SEALED DECISION AND ENTRY (DOC. # 23 )- The Court has been informed by the Sixth Circuit mediator that the parties have reached a settlement in the above-captioned action, but would like the Courtto unseal its September 28, 2018, Deci sion and Entry sustaining Defendants'Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record. Doc. #23. That filing was sealed only because of the potentially-sensitive medical records of Plaintiff cited therein. Based on the mediator's statement that neither party objects to the unsealing of that Decision and Entry, the Court ORDERS that it be UNSEALED. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 2/14/19. (kma)
August 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 13 DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANTS QUANTECH SERVICES, INC. SHORT-TERM DISABILITY PLAN, QUANTECH SERVICES, INC. LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN AND UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE ORDER ALLOWING PLAINTIF F TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY (DOC. # 10 ); DEFENDANTS ARE DIRECTED TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S INTERROGATORIES, REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS PROPOUNDED UPON DEFENDANTS WITHIN TEN DAYS OF THIS ENTRY- Accordingly, the Court overrules Defendants' Motion, and directs Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs discovery requests within ten days of the present Entry.( Discovery due by 9/10/2017.). Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 8/31/17. (kma)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dear v. Quantech Services, Inc. Short-term Disability Plan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deborah Dear
Represented By: Joseph P McDonald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quantech Services, Inc. Short-term Disability Plan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quantech Services, Inc. Long-Term Disability Plan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?