Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Mark Robinson |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2016cv00505 |
| December 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Sharon L. Ovington |
| Thomas M. Rose |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
DECISION AND ENTRY re 15 Stipulation filed by Commissioner of Social Security : The Parties Joint Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees (Doc. 15 ) is accepted and the Commissioner shall pay Plaintiffs attorney fees, costs,and expenses in the tota l amount of $4,500.00; Counsel for the parties shall verify, within thirty days of this Decision and Entry, whether or not Plaintiff owes a pre-existing debt to the United States subject to offset. If no such pre-existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA award directly to Plaintiffs counsel pursuant to the EAJA assignment signed by Plaintiff and counsel; and case remains terminated on the docket of this Court.. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 3/26/18. (ep)
|
|
Filing
14
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Signed on 2/22/18. (kma)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 12 Report and Recommendations - The Report and Recommendations docketed on February 5, 2018 12 is ADOPTED in full, the Commissioner's non-disability finding is reversed, in part, and the matter is remanded to the Social Security Administration under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g) for payment of benefits based on the disability onset date of May 21, 2014, to the extent Plaintiff seeks benefits based on the disability onset date of June 23, 2013 until May 20, 2014, the ALJs decision is affirmed; and the case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 2-21-2018. (de)
|
|
Filing
12
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 1) The Commissioner's non-disability finding be reversed, in part, and the matter be remanded to the Social Security Administration under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for payment of benefits based on the disability onset date of May 21, 2014; 2) To the extent Plaintiff seeks benefits based on the disability onset date of June 23, 2013 until May 20, 2014, the ALJ's decision be affirmed; and 3) The case be terminated on the docket of this Court Objections to R&R due by 2/20/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 2-5-18. (slo1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mark Robinson | |
| Represented By: | Stephanie D Dobson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | John J. Stark |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
