Secretary, US Department of Labor v. Demmy et al
Plaintiff: Secretary, Department of Labor
Defendant: Amy Demmy, Demmy Sand and Gravel, LLC and Demmy Sand & Gravel LLC Retirement Savings Plan
Case Number: 3:2017cv00032
Filed: February 3, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: HAMILTON
Presiding Judge: Walter H. Rice
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 21 CONSENT ORDER AND JUDGMENT - 21. The Court shall maintain jurisdiction over this matter only for purposes of enforcing this Consent Judgment and Order. 23. This Consent Order and Judgment does not resolve any criminal liability,or any restitution, forfeitures, or fmes arising out of such liability, if any, and paragraphs 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19 above shall only become effective and enforceable upon execution by both Defendant Demmy and the United States Attorney' s Office for the Southern District of Ohio of any plea agreement concerning the associated/related federal criminal investigation involving Defendant Demmy and her past management of Defendant Demmy Sand & Gravel, LLC and the Plan. Defendant Demmy ag rees to cooperate with the United States Attorney's Office in resolving any related criminal case. If the related criminal case is not resolved within 90 days of the entry of this Consent Order and Judgment, paragraphs 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, IO, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19 of this Judgment are not effective and this civil case will continue. All otherparagraphs in this Judgment are effective and enforceable upon entry of this Judgment. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 2/16/18. (kma)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Secretary, US Department of Labor v. Demmy et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Secretary, Department of Labor
Represented By: Maureen M Cafferkey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amy Demmy
Represented By: James Alan Coutinho
Represented By: John Matthew Fisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Demmy Sand and Gravel, LLC
Represented By: James Alan Coutinho
Represented By: John Matthew Fisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Demmy Sand & Gravel LLC Retirement Savings Plan
Represented By: James Alan Coutinho
Represented By: John Matthew Fisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?