Vaduva v. City of Xenia, Ohioet al
Plaintiff: |
Virgil J. Vaduva |
Defendant: |
City of Xenia, Ohio, Engle Michael, Joshua Long, John Caupp, Wesley Smith, Jeanne Mills, Marsha Bayless, Jeff Osburn and Dave Pazynski |
Case Number: |
3:2017cv00041 |
Filed: |
February 9, 2017 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Office: |
Dayton Office |
County: |
GREENE |
Presiding Judge: |
Thomas M. Rose |
Nature of Suit: |
Other Civil Rights |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
September 4, 2018 |
Filing
40
ENTRY AND ORDER denying 33 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting in part Defendant City of Xenia, Ohio's 34 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court DISMISSES Vaduva's facial and as applied challenge to Xenia Co dified Ordinance § 648.12 for lack of standing. Vaduva's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 33 is DENIED. The Court GRANTS Xenia's Motion for Summary Judgment 34 and DISMISSES all of Vaduva's remaining claims. This case shall be TERMINATED on the Courts docket. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 9-4-2018. (de)
|
March 12, 2018 |
Filing
32
ORDER - The discovery phase of this case has ended. No discovery motion or other matter referred to the undersigned Judicial Officer remains pending. The Clerk of Courts is directed to note in the record that: (1) referral of this case to the undersigned Judicial Officer has expired; and (2) no motion or other matter in this case remains pending before the undersigned Judicial Officer. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 3/12/18. (kma)
|
January 26, 2018 |
Filing
31
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DISCOVERY DEADLINES (DOC. 30 )- Having considered the joint motion by Plaintiff Virgil Vaduva and DefendantCity of Xenia to Extend the Discovery Deadlines and the cut-off date for filing summary judgmen t motions, the Court finds the motion well taken. The Court hereby orders the following changes in the Preliminary Pretrial Scheduling Order: 9. December 4, 2017Cut-off date for making requests for admissionsbe to February 4, 2018; 10. February 1, 20 18 Discovery Cut-off date be extended to March 9, 2018; 11. February 8, 2017 Discovery telephone conference be continued to April 11, 2018; and 12. March, 2018 Cut-off date for filing Summary judgment motions to be extended to May 1, 2018. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 1/26/18. (kma)
|
December 19, 2017 |
Filing
28
ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS 23 24 , ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 22 , GRANTING DEFENDANT CAUP'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 12 , GRANTING THE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 13 FILED BY DEFENDANTS THE CITY OF XENIA, ENGLE, LONG, SMITH, MILLS, BAYLESS, OSBURN, AND PAZYNSKI; AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS OFFICIAL CAPACITY CLAIMS. This case remains pending with regard to Plaintiff's claims against the City of Xenia. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 12-19-2017. (de)
|
October 23, 2017 |
Filing
22
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT: (1) DEFENDANT CAUPP'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (DOC. 12 ) BE GRANTED; (2) THE MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS FILED BY DEFENDANTS THE CITY OF XENIA, ENGLE, LONG, SMITH, MILLS, BAYLESS, OS BURN, AND PAZYNSKI BE GRANTED (DOC. 13 ); (3) PLAINTIFF'S OFFICIAL CAPACITY CLAIMS BE DISMISSED; AND (4) THAT THIS CASE REMAIN PENDING WITH REGARD TO CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY. Objections to R&R due by 11/6/2017 Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 10/23/2017. (srb)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?