Blankenship v. Bennett et al
||Corey A Blankenship
||Mark J Bennett, Village of Gratis Police Department and Village of Gratis
||March 10, 2017
||US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
||Sharon L. Ovington
||Walter H. Rice
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Personal Injury
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|April 4, 2018
ORDER OF DISMISSAL; TERMINATION ENTRY- The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the par ties may, upon good cause shown within 30 days, reopen the action ifsettlement is not consummated. Parties intending to preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America , 114 S.Ct. 1673 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary.. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 4/4/18. (kma)
|December 8, 2017
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 17 be GRANTED; 2. Defendants' Motion to Strike Exhibits 23 be DENIED as moot; and 3. Plaintiff be granted twenty days from the date of a Decision and Entry adopting this Report to file an Amended Complaint in compliance with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Objections to R&R due by 12/22/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 12-8-17. (mcm)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?