Miller v. Navistar, Inc.

Miller v. Navistar, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Edward Miller
Defendant:	Navistar, Inc.
Case Number:	3:2017cv00115
Filed:	April 6, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Dayton Office
County:	CLARK
Presiding Judge:	Walter H. Rice
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 17, 2018	Filing 30 ORDER OF DISMISSAL- TERMINATION ENTRY- The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the par ties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, reopen the action ifsettlement is not consummated. Parties intending to preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America , 114 S.Ct. 1673 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 5/17/18. (kma)
May 26, 2017	Filing 12 DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING AS MOOT DEFENDANT'S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT 8 . Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 5/26/2017. (pb)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 17, 2018

Filing 30 ORDER OF DISMISSAL- TERMINATION ENTRY- The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the par ties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, reopen the action ifsettlement is not consummated. Parties intending to preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America , 114 S.Ct. 1673 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 5/17/18. (kma)

May 26, 2017

Filing 12 DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING AS MOOT DEFENDANT'S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT 8 . Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 5/26/2017. (pb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller v. Navistar, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward Miller
Represented By:	Erica Ann Probst
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Navistar, Inc.
Represented By:	Erin D Fowler
Represented By:	Lindsey M Marcus
Represented By:	David Philip Pierce
Represented By:	David P Radelet
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?