Burrows v. FUYAO GLASS AMERICA INC. et al
| David Burrows |
| FUYAO GLASS AMERICA INC. and TAK WONG CHO |
| 3:2017cv00186 |
| May 25, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Thomas M. Rose |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: TERMINATION ENTRY - This Court having been advised that on or about March 5, 2020, the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within thirty (30) days, reopen theaction if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 3/6/20. (ep)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER- Pursuant to the informal discovery teleconference on February 7, 2020, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The discovery deadline is extended to April 1, 2020; and 2. The dispositive motion deadline is extended to May 1, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 2/7/2020. (kma)
|
|
Filing
30
AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 8/29/18. (kma)
|
|
Filing
23
DECISION AND ENTRY denying 6 18 Motions to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 12-8-2017. (de)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
