Baldwin v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Phyllis Baldwin |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2017cv00217 |
| June 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| CLARK |
| Sharon L. Ovington |
| Walter H. Rice |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
DECISION AND ENTRY- IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The Parties' Joint Stipulation for an Award of Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. # 17 ) is accepted and the Commissioner shall pay Plaintiffs attorney fees, costs, and expenses in the total amount of $5,900.00; 2. Counsel for the parties shall verify, within thirty days of this Decision and Entry, whether or not Plaintiff owes a pre-existing debt to the United States subject to offset. If no such pre-existing debt exists, Defendant shall pay the EAJA award directly to Plaintiffs counsel pursuant to the EAJA assignment signed by Plaintiff; and 3. The case remains terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 11/14/18. (kma)
|
|
Filing
15
DECISION AND ENTRY- It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendations filed on July 27, 2018 (Doc. # 14 ) is ADOPTED in full; 2. The Commissioner's non-disability finding is VACATED; 3. No finding is made as to whether Plaintiff Phyllis Baldwin was under a "disability" within the meaning of the Social Security Act" ' 4. This matter is REMANDED to the Social SecurityAdministration under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with the Report and Recommendations and this Decision; and 5. The case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 8/13/18. (kma)
|
|
Filing
14
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Commissioner's non-disability finding be vacated; no finding be made as to whether Plaintiff Phyllis Baldwin was under a "disability" within the meaning of the Social Security Act; this matter be REMAND ED to the Social Security Administration under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration consistent with this Report and Recommendations, and any decision adopting this Report and Recommendations; and the case be terminated on the Court's docket. Objections to R&R due by 8/10/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 7/27/2018. (lk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Baldwin v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Phyllis Baldwin | |
| Represented By: | Stephanie D Dobson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | John J. Stark |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
