Galluzzo v. State of Ohio, et al. et al
| Michael A Galluzzo |
| State of Ohio, et al. and Clark County Sheriff, et al. |
| 3:2017cv00218 |
| June 9, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| CLARK |
| Thomas M. Rose |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MERZ 26 , OVERRULING PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS 27 TO MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 26 , DENYING PETITIONER'S SECOND MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. 25 ). Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 3-28-2018. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
26
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON SECONDMOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION - Petitioner has shown no error in the Court's judgment dismissing his habeas corpus petition. His Second Motion for Reconsideration should therefore be DENIED. Because reasonable j urists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 3/28/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 3/14/2018. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 22 Motion for Reconsideration filed by Michael A Galluzzo, and 23 Report and Recommendations. It is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration be DENIED. Petitioner is DENIED a certificate of appealability and the Court herebycertifies to the United States Court of Appeals that an appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 3-6-2018. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
23
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION - The Magistrate Judge respectfully recommends Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 22) be DENIED. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petiti oner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 2/26/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 2/12/2018. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
20
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MERZ 18 , OVERRULING PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS 16 , 19 TO MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 15 , 18 , DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, 1 , AND TERMINATING THE INSTANT CASE. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 1-19-2018. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
18
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Because Galluzzo has not exhausted available state court remedies for his constitutional claims, it is again respectfully recommended that his Petition be dismissed without prejudice for lack of exhaustion. Objections to R&R due by 10/17/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 10/3/2017. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing
15
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 14 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Michael A Galluzzo- Accordingly, it is respectfully recommended that the Amended Petition herein be dismissed, without prejudice to its refiling after Petitioner has exh austed his available state court remedies. Objections to R&R due by 9/29/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 9/15/17. (kma)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
