Hake et al v. Simpson et al
| Nathaniel William Hake, Nathan Hake Farms, LLC and Wheel Polishing Pros, LLC |
| Michael Simpson, Michael Spitler, Paul Plaugher, Raymond Hatfield, Randy Johnson, Pamela Johnson, Glen Blacker, James C. Ellis, Noble Opportunity Fund II, LP, Greenwich Investors XLVIII Trust 2014-1, LCNB Bank, Jeff Meeker and Mark Florence |
| 3:2017cv00420 |
| December 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| PREBLE |
| Thomas M. Rose |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM BY DEFENDANTS GLEN BLACKER, JAMES C. ELLIS, PAMELA JOHNSON, RANDY JOHNSON AND NOBLEOPPORTUNITY FUND II, LP, 27 , MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS MOTION BY DEFENDANT MARK FL ORENCE, 35 AND MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS BY DEFENDANTS RAYMOND HATFIELD, PAUL PLAUGHER, MICHAEL SIMPSON AND MICHAEL SPITLER, 37 , MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS BY DEFENDANTS LCNB BANK AND JEFF MEEKER, 39 AND TERMINATING CASE. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 8-20-2018. (de)
|
|
Filing
6
SHOW CAUSE ORDER -Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause by December 29, 2017 why the case should not be dismissed. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 12-20-2017. (de)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
