Canon Inc. v. Ink Technologies Printer Supplies, LLC
Plaintiff: Canon Inc.
Defendant: Ink Technologies Printer Supplies, LLC
Case Number: 3:2018cv00058
Filed: February 28, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office: Dayton Office
County: MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge: Walter H. Rice
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STAY PENDING RELATED ITC PROCEEDINGS (DOC. # 7 ); ADMINISTRATIVELY PROCESSING CASE. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 4/2/18. (kma)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Canon Inc. v. Ink Technologies Printer Supplies, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Canon Inc.
Represented By: Gregory Frederick Ahrens
Represented By: Paul Jason Linden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ink Technologies Printer Supplies, LLC
Represented By: David Alan Shough
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?