McCain v. Sheldon
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 27, 2018
RECOMMITTAL ORDER - This habeas corpus case is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 10 ) to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations (ECF No. 7 ). The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections a nd believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with instructions to file a supplemental re port analyzing the Objections and making recommendations based on that analysis.. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 3/27/18. (kma)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|March 9, 2018
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Magistrate Judge therefore respectfully recommends the Petition herein be dismissed with prejudice as barred by the statute of limitations. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitione r should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 3/23/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 3/9/2018. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?