Parrella v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Southern District Parrella v. Commissioner of Social Security

Parrella v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Michelli L Parrella
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	3:2018cv00116
Filed:	April 11, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Office:	Dayton Office
County:	BUTLER
Presiding Judge:	Michael J. Newman
Presiding Judge:	Walter H. Rice
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 416
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 20, 2019	Filing 18 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS- Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #17) is ADOPTED in full; 2. The Commissioner's non-disability determination is AFFIRMED; and 3. This case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 5/20/19. (kma)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
May 3, 2019	Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION1 THAT: (1) THE ALJS NON-DISABILITY FINDING BE FOUND SUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE AND AFFIRMED; (2) PRO SE PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR A SENTENCE FOUR REMAND BE DENIED; AND (3) THIS CASE BE CLOSED ON THE COURTS DOCKET. Objections to R&R due by 5/17/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 5/3/19. (kma)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 20, 2019

Filing 18 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS- Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #17) is ADOPTED in full; 2. The Commissioner's non-disability determination is AFFIRMED; and 3. This case is terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 5/20/19. (kma)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

May 3, 2019

Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION1 THAT: (1) THE ALJS NON-DISABILITY FINDING BE FOUND SUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE AND AFFIRMED; (2) PRO SE PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR A SENTENCE FOUR REMAND BE DENIED; AND (3) THIS CASE BE CLOSED ON THE COURTS DOCKET. Objections to R&R due by 5/17/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 5/3/19. (kma)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parrella v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelli L Parrella
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By:	John J. Stark
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?