Stewart v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Wendy Stewart |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 3:2018cv00237 |
| July 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| GREENE |
| Sharon L Ovington |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Shefali Baltz for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Baltz, Shefali) Modified attorney role on 8/14/2018 (rp). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. Commissioner of Social Security served on 7/20/2018, answer due 9/18/2018. (Dobson, Stephanie) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General, and Office of General Counsel (jmb) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Wendy Stewart. (jmb) |
NOTATION ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 7/16/2018. (lk)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Wendy Stewart. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Form, #4 Summons Form, #5 Summons Form, #6 Summons Form) (Dobson, Stephanie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
