Flores-Lopez v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
| Eleazar Florez-Lopez and Eleazar Flores-Lopez |
| Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution |
| 3:2018cv00330 |
| October 1, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Michael R Merz |
| Walter H Rice |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing 2254 Proceedings, the Clerk shall serve a copy of the Petition, the original Report and Recommendations, and this Supplemental Report on the Attorney General of Ohio. Objections to R&R due by 12/10/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 11/23/2018. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 8
RECOMMITTAL ORDER - This case is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. #7 ) to the Magistrate.Judge's Report and Recommendations (ECF No. #4 ). The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropri ately resolved after further anal ysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with instructions to file a supplemental report analyzing the Objections and making recommendations based on that analysis. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 11/21/18. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 7 OBJECTION to #4 Report and Recommendations by Petitioner Eleazar Flores-Lopez. (pb) |
|
Filing 6
Notation ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Objections to the pending Report and Recommendations to and including November 20, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 10/20/2018. (MRM)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Objection re #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Eleazar Flores-Lopez - new date requested 11/20/2018 - by Petitioner Eleazar Flores-Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (mr) |
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Magistrate Judge respectfully recommends that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, Petitioner should be denied a certificate of appealability and the Court should certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 10/17/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 10/2/2018. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
| Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Eleazar Florez-Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (kpf) |
| Notice of Correction re: #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) CA replaced document with petition containing the correct time stamp. The document was originally filed with the incorrect time stamp of 9/31/2018. (kma) |
|
Filing 2
Notation ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall detach and file the Petition as a separate document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 10/01/2018. (MRM)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) by Petitioner Eleazar Florez-Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 2254 Writ of Habeas Corpus) (kma) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/1/2018: to add petition with correct time stamp. Petition originally had incorrect time stamp of 9/31/18. Modified on 10/1/2018 (kma). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
