City of Dayton v. 3M Company et al
City of Dayton |
Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, National Foam, Inc., 3M Company, Tyco Fire Products LP and Chemguard, Inc. |
3:2018cv00331 |
October 3, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Elizabeth Preston Deavers |
Walter H Rice |
Edmund A Sargus |
Tort Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants Chemguard, Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP, Johnson Controls International plc identifying Corporate Parent Johnson Controls International plc for Chemguard, Inc... (Ireland, Donald) |
Filing 14 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants Chemguard, Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP, Johnson Controls International plc identifying Corporate Parent Johnson Controls International plc for Tyco Fire Products LP.. (Ireland, Donald) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Erin Rhinehart for Defendants Chemguard, Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP (Rhinehart, Erin) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Donald Jeffrey Ireland for Defendants Chemguard, Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP (Ireland, Donald) |
Filing 11 ORDER Granting #10 Dfts' Unopposed Joint Motion for Extension of Time until 12/20/2018 to Respond to Complaint. If Dfts' move to dismiss, Plt's may have until 1/25/2019 to respond to that motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 10/30/2018. (sln) |
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, New date requested 12/20/2018. by Defendants 3M Company, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, Chemguard, Inc., National Foam, Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP. (Corwin, Jonathan) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendants 3M Company, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, Chemguard, Inc., National Foam, Inc., and Tyco Fire Products LP. 3M Company served on 10/18/2018, answer due 11/8/2018; Buckeye Fire Equipment Company served on 10/18/2018, answer due 11/8/2018; Chemguard, Inc. served on 10/18/2018, answer due 11/8/2018; National Foam, Inc. served on 10/17/2018, answer due 11/7/2018; Tyco Fire Products LP served on 10/17/2018, answer due 11/7/2018. (jmb) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Mailing by Clerk: Certified mail service has been done by the Clerk, U.S. District Court on October 15, 2018. A copy of the complaint, document 1, and summons, document 3, was sent by certified mail to the following locations: CT Corporation System for National Foam, Inc., 4400 EastonCommons Way, Suite 125, Columbus, OH 43219 Article Number (91 7199 9991 70304994 8691) Chemguard, One Stanton St., Marinette, WI, 54143, Article Number(91 7199 9991 7030 4994 8905) Tyco Fire Products, c/o Statutory Agent CT Corporation System, 4400 Easton Commons Way, Suite 125, Columbus, OH 43219, Article Number (91 7199 9991 7030 4994 8684) Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, 110 Kings Rd., Kings Mountain, NC 28086, ArticleNumber (91 7199 9991 7030 4994 8912)3M Company, c/o Statutory Agent Corporation Service Company, 2345 Rice St., Suite 230, Roseville, MN, 55113, Article Number ( 91 7199 9991 7030 4994 8929). (kma) |
Filing 7 ORDER - The Court STRIKES Plaintiffs summons returns 5 & #6 for noncompliance with the Local Rules. The deadline to respond to the Complaint is VACATED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on October 15, 2018. (jlk) |
Termination of Answer due date. (jlk) |
Filing 6 STRICKEN PER ORDER #7 ***SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendants 3M Company, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, Chemguard, Inc., National Foam, Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt Return 3M, #2 Certified Mail Receipt Return Buckeye, #3 Certified Mail Receipt Return Chemguard, #4 Certified Mail Receipt Return National Foam, #5 Certified Mail Receipt Return Tyco) (Tismo, J) Modified text on 10/15/2018 (jlk). |
NOTICE re 5 Summons Returned Executed: Document was filed incorrectly by counsel without service and answer dates reflected in the docket text. Counsel is to refile document with service dates and answer dates reflected in docket text. (kma) |
Notice of Correction re: 4 Certificate of Service: Case Administrator restricted document because it was filed in error by counsel. Document has been regenerated to notify counsel of change. (kma) |
Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus and Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers added. Judge Walter H. Rice no longer assigned to case (per the directions of Chief Judge Sargus' chambers and its relation to MDL 2433, this case was directly reassigned to Chief Judge Sargus and Magistrate Judge Deavers). (sem) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to 3M Company, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, Chemguard, Inc., National Foam, Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP. (kma) |
Filing 2 Notice by Clerk of Southern District of Ohio of Pro Hac Vice Rules as to Attorney Paul J. Napoli, Patrick J. Lancotti, Tate J. Kunkle, and Louise R. Caro. (kma) |
Notice: If case is to be referred it will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman. (kma) |
NOTICE re #1 Complaint: There are additional Plaintiff's counsel listed on supplemental civil cover sheet. Additional counsel must enter a Notice of Appearance to receive notices on the case. (kma) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-6624701), filed by City of Dayton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Form) (Tismo, J) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.