de Souza v. Wright State University et al
| Crystal de Souza |
| Richard Thomas, Wright State University, Daniel Monaghan and Sandy Napier |
| 3:2019cv00016 |
| January 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Wright State University on 1/19/2019, answer due 3/20/2019. (Fradin, Michael) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Daniel Monaghan on 1/19/2019, answer due 3/20/2019. (Fradin, Michael) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Sandy Napier on 1/19/2019, answer due 3/20/2019. (Fradin, Michael) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Richard Thomas on 1/19/2019, answer due 3/20/2019. (Fradin, Michael) |
| Notice: If case is to be referred it will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman. (kma) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Plaintiff Crystal de Souza Civil Cover Sheet (Fradin, Michael) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Fradin for Plaintiff Crystal de Souza (Fradin, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-6756967), filed by Crystal de Souza. (Fradin, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
