McManus v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff: Isaac McManus
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc. and Jane Does 1-100
Case Number: 3:2019cv00066
Filed: March 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Thomas M Rose
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2019 Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Plaintiff Isaac McManus. (Zogbaum, Julie)
April 1, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant Smith & Nephew, Inc.. (Oldham, Steven)
March 12, 2019 Set/Reset Deadlines: Smith & Nephew, Inc. answer due 4/1/2019. (kma)
March 11, 2019 Filing 7 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO MOVE OR PLEAD by Defendant Smith & Nephew, Inc.. (Oldham, Steven)
March 8, 2019 Opinion or Order NOTATION ORDER GRANTING #6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Julie B. Zogbaum. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 3/8/2019. (srb)
March 7, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number 0648-6828173) of Julie B. Zogbaum by Plaintiff Isaac McManus. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (Burleson, Lisa)
March 5, 2019 Filing 4 Notice by Clerk of Southern District of Ohio of Pro Hac Vice Rules as to Attorney Julie B. Zogbaum (kma)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
March 5, 2019 Filing 3 (Copy of) COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Smith & Nephew, Inc. originally filed in Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, on February 1, 2019, under case number 2019 CV 00527. (kma)
March 5, 2019 Notice: If case is to be referred it will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington. (kma)
March 4, 2019 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Smith & Nephew, Inc.. (Oldham, Steven)
March 4, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2019 CV 00527 ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-6821837), filed by Smith & Nephew, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) (Oldham, Steven)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McManus v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Represented By: Steven Andrew Oldham
Represented By: Eric Larson Zalud
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Does 1-100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Isaac McManus
Represented By: Julie B. Zogbaum
Represented By: Lisa Marie Burleson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?