Easterling v. Trump et al
| Warren Easterling, r |
| Michael J. Newman, Timothy S Black, Thomas M Rose, Sharon L Ovington, Edmund A Sargus, Jr, President Donald J. Trump, Joseph M Hood, Algenon Marbley and Walter H Rice |
| 3:2019cv00112 |
| April 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Michael J Newman |
| Walter H Rice |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1985 |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 PLAINTIFF'S: MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (RULE 65B) AND MOTION FOR A TRIAL ON THE MERITS by Plaintiff Warren Easterling, r. (srb) |
| Filing 3 PLAINTIFF'S: NOTICE OF TWO FEDERAL QUESTIONS by Plaintiff Warren Easterling, r (srb) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants (srb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Warren Easterling, r. (Attachments: #1 Filing Fee Receipt, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Form, #4 Exhibit 1, #5 Exhibit 2, #6 Exhibit AA, #7 Exhibit BB, #8 Exhibit 3, #9 Exhibit 4, #10 Exhibit 5, #11 Exhibit 6, #12 Exhibit 9, #13 Exhibit 5, #14 Exhibit 10, #15 Exhibit 5A, #16 Exhibit 5B, #17 Exhibit 5C, #18 Exhibit 11, #19 Exhibit 12, #20 Exhibit 13, #21 Exhibit 14, #22 Exhibit 15, #23 Exhibit 15 - 6 PGS, #24 Exhibit 16, #25 Exhibit 17, #26 Exhibit 18, #27 Exhibit 19, #28 Exhibit 20, #29 Exhibit 21, #30 Exhibit 22, #31 Exhibit 23, #32 Exhibit 24, #33 Exhibit 25, #34 Exhibit 26, #35 Exhibit 27) (srb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.