In re: Ralph Louis and Lisa A. Citro
| Donald F Harker, III and Chapter 7 Trustee in Bankruptcy |
| Internal Revenue Service and AAG Ohio Department of Taxation |
| Lisa A. Citro and Ralph Louis Citro |
| U.S. Bankruptcy Court |
| 3:2019cv00139 |
| May 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Bankruptcy Withdrawal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0157 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by James Shafor Harding for Creditor Ohio Department of Taxation (Harding, James) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Responses due by 6/18/2019 Replies due by 7/2/2019. (de) |
NOTATION ORDER - re #2 Motion to Withdraw Reference - Responses in opposition to the motion, if any, must be filed on or before June 18, 2019. Replies in support of the motion, if any, must be filed on or before July 2, 2019. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 6-4-2019. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Withdraw Reference by Defendant Internal Revenue Service. (er) |
| Filing 1 Notice of WITHDRAWAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. Bankruptcy Court case number 3:18-ap-03008. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Appeal Transmittal Cover Sheet) (er) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
