Gibson v. Conley et al
| Holly S Gibson |
| City of Kettering, Ohio and Officer Tom Conley |
| 3:2019cv00296 |
| September 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (ep) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Holly S Gibson (Brannon, Dwight) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand filed by City of Kettering, Ohio, Officer Tom Conley. (Dowd, Edward) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Edward Joseph Dowd for Defendants City of Kettering, Ohio, Officer Tom Conley (Dowd, Edward) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Todd Herman for Defendants City of Kettering, Ohio, Officer Tom Conley (Herman, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 (Copy of) COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against City of Kettering, Ohio, Officer Tom Conley form Montgomery County Common Pleas Court on 8/16/19, under case number 2019-cv-3784, filed by Holly S Gibson. (pb) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Montgomery County Common Pleas Court, case number 2019-cv-3784, filed by City of Kettering, Ohio, Officer Tom Conley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Complaint) Receipt Number 0648-7114499 $400.00(pb) Modified on 9/19/2019 (pb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
