Morgan v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Susan D Morgan |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 3:2019cv00361 |
| November 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Sharon L Ovington |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER OF CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of a final judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 12/05/2019. (jmb)
|
|
Filing 4
JOINT CONSENT OF THE PARTIES TO PROCEED BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE . (Julis, Rachel)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel Julis for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Julis, Rachel) Modified attorney role and notification on 12/4/2019 (rp).
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (pb)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Susan D Morgan. Receipt Number 0648-7200124 $400.00 (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form, #3 Summons Form, #4 Summons Form) (Raper, Robert) Modified on 11/15/2019 (pb).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
