Schaaf v. Warden, Chilicothe Correctional Institution
Petitioner: Gabriel Schaaf
Respondent: Warden, Chilicothe Correctional Institution
Case Number: 3:2020cv00090
Filed: March 11, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Michael R Merz
Referring Judge: Thomas M Rose
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Notation ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution answer due 7/10/2020.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 5/8/2020. (MRM)
May 8, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer New date requested 7/10/2020. the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Respondent Warden, Chilicothe Correctional Institution. (Lamb, William)
March 19, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by William H Lamb for Respondent Warden, Chilicothe Correctional Institution (Lamb, William)
March 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER TO ANSWER- Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Respondent shall, not later than May 11, 2020, file an answer conforming to the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases. Before filing the answer, the Respondent shall file those portions of the state court record needed to adjudicate this case. When the record is filed electronically, the Courts CM/ECF filing system will affix a unique PageID number to each page of the record, displayed in the upper right-hand corner of the page. All papers filed in the case thereafter by either party shall include record references to the PageID number. Prior to filing the state court record, the Wardens counsel shall ensure that any borders on parts of the record (typically, court reporter transcripts) do not obscure the PageID number when the page is filed. The record shall be indexed by insertion of bookmarks in the.pdf version of the state court record uploaded to the Courts CM/ECF system which display each exhibit and the name of that exhibit in the record. As required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 5, a complete copy of the answer and state court record with the PageID numbers and bookmarks must be served on Petitioner at the time of filing. Petitioner may, not later than twenty-one days after filing of the answer, file and serve a reply to the answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 3/12/2020. (kma)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
March 11, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, (Filing Fee Paid Receipt Number 300DAY023512) filed by Gabriel Schaaf. (pb) Modified on 3/12/2020 to add receipt number (srb).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schaaf v. Warden, Chilicothe Correctional Institution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gabriel Schaaf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden, Chilicothe Correctional Institution
Represented By: William H Lamb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?