Stoermer v. Warden, London Correctional Institution
| Casey Stoermer |
| Warden, London Correctional Institution |
| 3:2020cv00133 |
| April 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Michael R Merz |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Notation ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Warden, London Correctional Institution answer due 8/10/2020.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 6/5/2020. (MRM)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer New date requested 8/10/2020. to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Respondent Warden, London Correctional Institution. (Reese, Mary) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary Anne Reese for Respondent Warden, London Correctional Institution (Reese, Mary) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER FOR ANSWER- Before filing the answer, the Respondent shall file those portions of the state court record needed to adjudicate this case. When the record is filed electronically, the Courts CM/ECF filing system will affix a unique PageID number to each page of the record, displayed in the upper righthand corner of the page. All papers filed in the case thereafter by either party shall include record references to the PageID number. Prior to filing the state court record, the Wardens counsel shall ensure that any borders on parts of the record (typically, court reporter transcripts) do not obscurethe PageID number when the page is filed. The record shall be indexed by insertion of bookmarks in the.pdf version of the state court record uploaded to the Courts CM/ECF system which display each exhibit and the name of that exhibit in the record. As required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 5, a complete copy of the answer and state court record with the PageID numbers and bookmarks must be served on Petitioner at the time of filing. Petitioner may, not later than twenty-one days after the filing of the answer, file and serve a reply to the answer.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 4/9/2020. (kma)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Casey Stoermer. (pb) |
| Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 300DAY023617 (pb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stoermer v. Warden, London Correctional Institution | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden, London Correctional Institution | |
| Represented By: | Mary Anne Reese |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Casey Stoermer | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
