Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security
3:2020cv00236 |
June 17, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Dayton Office |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 OPINION AND ORDER granting 20 Motion for Attorney Fees; The Motion for Allowance of Attorney Fees, ECF No. 20, is GRANTED. The Court AWARDS plaintiff's counsel an attorney fee of $ 10,697.48 or twenty-five percent (25%) of the past due benefits, whichever is less.Plaintiffs counsel is ORDERED to return to the Plaintiff the fee awarded under the EAJA promptly upon receipt of the fee awarded under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 3/11/24. (sh) |
Filing 19 ORDER granting 18 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 8/24/22. (sh) |
Filing 16 OPINION AND ORDER granting Plf's 10 Statement of Errors; REVERSES the Commissioners decision and REMANDS the matter for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion and Order. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter FINAL JUDGMENT pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 6/17/22. (sh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.