Collins v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Carlene Collins
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA
Case Number: 3:2020cv00245
Filed: June 18, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Michael J Newman
Referring Judge: Walter H Rice
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTATION ORDER: For good cause shown, and absent objection, the Commissioner's motion for an extension of time to file the administrative record (doc. #8 ) is GRANTED. The Commissioner shall file the administrative record in this case on or before 10/19/2020. The Court is amenable to granting a further extension of time in this regard, if necessary, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 8/3/2020. (mhr)
August 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer New date requested 10/19/2020. by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit DECLARATION OF JEBBY RASPUTNIS) (Baltz, Shefali)
July 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER OF CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Michael J. Newman. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 7/17/2020. (kma)
July 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 JOINT CONSENT OF THE PARTIES TO PROCEED BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE . (Baltz, Shefali)
July 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Shefali Baltz for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Baltz, Shefali)
June 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Deadlines: Commissioner of Social Security answer due 8/18/2020. (jmb)
June 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Carlene Collins. (kma)
June 19, 2020 Opinion or Order NOTATION ORDER GRANTING #1 PLAINTIFF'S Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 6/19/2020. (dm)
June 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Carlene Collins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 SSA ID Form) (Rake, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Collins v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlene Collins
Represented By: Michael A Rake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: John J. Stark
Represented By: Shefali Baltz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?