Adams v. Commissioner of Social Security
Gary Adams |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA |
3:2020cv00246 |
June 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Michael J Newman |
Thomas M Rose |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER OF CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Michael J. Newman. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of a final judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 07/15/2020. (jmb) |
Filing 5 JOINT CONSENT OF THE PARTIES TO PROCEED BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE . (Kellup, Kiywhanna) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Kiywhanna LaChic Kellup for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Kellup, Kiywhanna) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Commissioner of Social Security answer due 8/18/2020. (jmb) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Gary Adams. (srb) |
NOTATION ORDER GRANTING #1 PLAINTIFF'S Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 6/19/2020. (dm) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Gary Adams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 SSA ID Form) (Rake, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.