Foster v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Deborah Kaye Foster |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2020cv00325 |
| August 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Michael J Newman |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer New date requested 12/8/2020. by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Kellup, Kiywhanna)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Michael J. Newman. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of a final judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 09/14/2020. (jmb)
|
|
Filing 4
JOINT CONSENT OF THE PARTIES TO PROCEED BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE . (Kellup, Kiywhanna)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Kiywhanna LaChic Kellup for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Kellup, Kiywhanna)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Commissioner of Social Security answer due 10/9/2020. (jmb)
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE TO COUNSEL: a. In accordance with S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 8.1(a) In cases arising under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) or 42 U.S.C. 1383(c)(3), the plaintiff will file a Complaint with the Clerk, along with a Social Security Identification Form. The Social Security Identification Form will be lodged in CM/ECF as a restricted document and sent via Notice of Electronic Filing to the U.S. Attorneys Office for the Southern District of Ohio and Regional Counsel for the Social Security Administration through the CM/ECF system. Service will be considered complete when the CM/ECF system generates electronic service of the Complaint and Social Security Identification Form on the U.S. Attorneys Office for the Southern District of Ohio and Regional Counsel for the Social Security Administration. A copy of the form can be found on the Courts Website at https://www.ohsd.uscourts.gov/ohio-southern-district-forms. re #1 (kma)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Deborah Kaye Foster ( Filing fee $ 400 paid - receipt number: 0648-7591463), filed by Deborah Kaye Foster. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Brian, Richard)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Foster v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Kiywhanna LaChic Kellup |
| Represented By: | John J. Stark |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Deborah Kaye Foster | |
| Represented By: | Richard F Brian |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
