McComb v. Dominium Property Management et al
Plaintiff: Robert McComb
Defendant: Kristen Dottillis, Karen Kline, Alicia Lake, Karen Stegall, Dominium Property Management, Penny Magos, Larry Lasky, Douglass E. Turner and Melody Jane Doe
Case Number: 3:2020cv00369
Filed: September 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Michael J Newman
Referring Judge: Walter H Rice
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to File a Response to Defendant Laurence Lasky Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Civil Rule 12 (B)(6) Memorandum in Support and Memorandum of Law by Plaintiff Robert McComb. (kma)
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to File a Reply Brief to Defendant Laurence Lasky Pending Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Civil Rule 12 (B)(6). by Plaintiff Robert McComb. (kma)
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION- Plaintiff's Request for Judicial Notice by Plaintiff Robert McComb. (kma)
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Larry Lasky. (Roderer, Paul)
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul B Roderer, Jr for Defendant Larry Lasky (Roderer, Paul)
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (pb)
September 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Melody Jane Doe, Dominium Property Management, Kristen Dottillis, Karen Kline, Alicia Lake, Larry Lasky, Penny Magos, Karen Stegall, Douglass E. Turner, filed by Robert McComb. (pb)
September 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - Accordingly, upon the receipt of the required forms necessary to effectuate service of process, the Clerk is ORDERED to forward the required documents to the U.S. Marshal for service on Defendants. The Court NOTIFIES pro se Plaintiff of his duty to complete service of process on each Defendant within 90 days from the date of this Order. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this case without prejudice. The Court further NOTIFIES Plaintiff of his continuing duty to advise the Court and opposing parties of all changes to his contact information so that he has notice of, inter alia, all Court filings, including all motions filed by Defendants and Court Orders. Plaintiff is further NOTIFIED that failure to keep the Court and opposing counsel apprised of all changes to his contact information may result in severe consequences, including the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 9/22/20. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
September 22, 2020 Opinion or Order NOTATION ORDER: This civil case is before the Court on Defendant Larry Laskys motion for leave to move or plead in response to Plaintiffs pro se complaint. Doc. 2. At the time Defendant filed his motion, the Court had not yet completed its review of Plaintiffs complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915 and, thus, had not yet approved issuance of service of process in this case. In addition, the docket reflects that the Clerk has not yet issued a summons to Plaintiff for completion of service on Defendants. Accordingly, Defendant Laskys motion appears to be moot. Nevertheless, the undersigned GRANTS Defendant Laskys motion (doc. 2) and ORDERS that he need not move or plead in response to Plaintiffs complaint until 10/18/2020 or whenever otherwise proper under the Federal Rules following the completion of service by Plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 9/22/20. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer New date requested 10/18/2020. by Defendant Larry Lasky. (Lasky, Laurence)
September 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) by Plaintiff Robert McComb. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Summons Forms, #4 U.S Marshal Forms, #5 Motion to File Excess Pages) (kma)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McComb v. Dominium Property Management et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kristen Dottillis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Karen Kline
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alicia Lake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Karen Stegall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dominium Property Management
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Penny Magos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larry Lasky
Represented By: Paul B Roderer, Jr
Represented By: Laurence Alan Lasky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Douglass E. Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Melody Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert McComb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?