Sarr v. Warden, Southeastern Correctional Institution
Samba Sarr |
Warden, Southeastern Correctional Institution |
3:2020cv00429 |
October 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Michael R Merz |
Walter H Rice |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Signed on 11/23/20. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 6 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. #2 ); OVERRULING PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS THERETO (DOC. #5 ); DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS WITH PREJUDICE (DOC. #1 ); DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS; JUDGMENT TO ENTER IN FAVOR OF RESPONDENT AND AGAINST PETITIONER; TERMINATION ENTRY. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 11/19/20. (pb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 5 OBJECTION to #2 Report and Recommendations by Petitioner Samba Sarr. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jmb) |
Filing 4 Notation ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to File objections to pending Report and Recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 11/9/2020. (MRM) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. New date requested 11/23/2020. by Petitioner Samba Sarr. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (kma) |
Filing 2 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Based on the foregoing analysis, it is respectfully recommended that the Petition herein be dismissed with prejudice. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with this conclusion, it is also recommended that Petitioner be denied a certificate of appealability and that the Court certify to the Sixth Circuit that any appeal would be objectively frivolous and should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. Objections to R&R due by 11/9/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 10/24/2020. (kpf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing fee was received in the amount of $ 5.00 and returned to the Plaintiff per the IFP. (jlk) Modified text on 10/27/2020 (jlk). |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Samba Sarr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope) (ew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sarr v. Warden, Southeastern Correctional Institution | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Samba Sarr | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden, Southeastern Correctional Institution | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.