Bender v. Department of Veteran's Affairs
Lawrence J Bender, Jr |
Department of Veteran's Affairs |
3:2020cv00441 |
October 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Douglas R Cole |
Michael J Newman |
Chelsey M Vascura |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 OBJECTION to #2 Report and Recommendations by Plaintiff Lawrence J Bender, Jr. (kma) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to file Objections. Plaintiff shall have until December 23, 2020, to file his objections to the Report & Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura on 11/24/2020. (daf)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) filed by Lawrence J Bender, Jr. Objections to R&R due by 12/23/2020 (daf) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to file Objections by Plaintiff Lawrence J Bender, Jr. (cib) |
Filing 5 OBJECTION to #2 Report and Recommendations by Plaintiff Lawrence J Bender, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Affidavit, #3 Letter) (cib) |
Filing 4 ORDER: Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura added. Judge Michael J. Newman no longer assigned as referral judge to case. Signed by Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 11/16/2020. (ss) |
Filing 3 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Michael J. Newman for all further proceedings. Judge Douglas R. Cole no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 11/13/2020. (ss) |
Filing 2 ORDER GRANTING PRO SE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS [DOC. #1 *** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT: (1) PLAINTIFF'S PRO SE COMPLAINT (DOC. 1-1) BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; AND (2) THIS CASE BE TERMINATED ON THE COURT'S DOCKET. (Objections to R&R due by 11/23/2020). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 11/9/2020. (srb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The Office of the Clerk is in possession of all necessary service documents) by Plaintiff Lawrence J Bender, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Summons Form, #3 USM 285 Form, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (pb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bender v. Department of Veteran's Affairs | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lawrence J Bender, Jr | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Department of Veteran's Affairs | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.