3M Company v. Premium Contractor Solution, LLC
| 3:2020cv00443 |
| November 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ENTRY AND ORDER AWARDING DAMAGES TO THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF, PREMIUM CONTRACTOR SOLUTION, LLC, AGAINST THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT, YING KANG - Consistent with this Order and the Courts March 15, 2022 Order that found PCS was entitled to default judgment in its favor and against Kang on PCS's claims of fraud and violation of the ODTPA (Doc. No. 64 ), the Court AWARDS damages to PCS and against Kang in the amount of $2,633,262.25. The Court ORDERS the Clerk to enter Judgment against Kang i n accordance with this Order and the Courts March 15, 2022 Order (Doc. No. 64 ). Finally, the Court notes that PCS indicated in its December 21, 2021 Status Report that it is dismissing the remaining Third-Party Claims [i.e., claims other than tho se brought against Kang] to pursue some, not all, in another case. (Doc. No. 63 at PageID 488.) Additionally, the Court notes that Plaintiff 3M Company and Defendant PCS told the Court on August 23, 2021 that, [u]pon the Court's entry of t he Consent Judgment, the parties will file a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal. (Doc. No. 57 at PageID 435 (emphasis in original).) The Court entered the Consent Judgment on August 24, 2021 (Doc. No. 58 ), but those parties have yet to file a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal.. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 4/22/2022. (srb)
|
|
Filing
64
ENTRY AND ORDER granting, in part, 61 Premium Contractor Solution, LLC's Motion for Default Judgment against Third-Party Defendant, Ying Kang. PCS is entitled to default judgment in its favor and against Kang as to liability on PCS's claims of fraud and violation of the ODTPA. By separate entry, the Court will set an evidentiary hearing to determine damages. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 3-15-2022. (mm)
|
|
Filing
59
ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS OF THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS LAWRENCE GROUP, INC. AND XIAOLI YANG UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(2) 50 . Third-Party Plaintiff Premium Contractor Solution, LLC has not made the requisite prima facie showing that personal jurisdiction exists in this Court over Lawrence Group or Yang. Both Lawrence Group, Inc. and Xiaoli Yang are dismissed from this case. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 8-24-2021. (mm)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER REQUIRING THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF PREMIUM CONTRACTOR SOLUTION, LLC TO PROVIDE A STATUS REPORT REGARDING ITS EFFORTS TO PERFECT SERVICE ON THIRD-PARTYDEFENDANTS : The Court ORDERS Third-Party Plaintiff Premium Contractor Solution, LLC to inform th e Court either during the on-the-record May 19, 2021, Telephone Status Conference or in a written filing prior to that conference of the efforts that it has taken to serve a copy of the summons and complaint on any third-party defendant who has not yet appeared in this action. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 5/12/21. (ep)
|
|
Filing
27
ENTRY AND ORDER STRIKING 19 1st Amended Answer and Third Party Complaint filed by Premium Contractor Solution, LLC, and STRIKING 22 Answer and Second Amended Third Party Complaint filed by Premium Contractor Solution, LLC. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 2-1-2021. (de)
|
|
Filing
16
AGREED PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 11/23/20. (ep)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: 3M Company v. Premium Contractor Solution, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
