Christian v. Adducci
Defendant: Director ICE Rebecca Adducci
Petitioner: Eva Christian
Case Number: 3:2020cv00444
Filed: October 29, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Presiding Judge: Michael R Merz
Referring Judge: Thomas M Rose
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 18, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE by Defendant Rebecca Adducci Notice of Correction of Defendant's Official Title (Smarda, Jade)
December 16, 2020 Filing 10 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,, and Motion to Dismiss filed by Rebecca Adducci. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Yarman Declaration, #2 Exhibit B - LaBier Declaration) (Smarda, Jade)
December 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Notation ORDER - The Court recognizes the applicability 0f S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 6.1 to the current order for answer, such that the parties' stipulation for a three-day extension of time for the Respondent to answer is effective.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 12/11/2020. (MRM)
December 11, 2020 Filing 8 STIPULATION for Extension of Time, or Alternative Unopposed Motion for Extension by Defendant Rebecca Adducci. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Smarda, Jade)
December 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER OF REFERENCE - Upon unanimous consent of the parties hereto, and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), the above-captioned action is hereby referred to United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz for all further proceedings herein, including trial, the entry of judgment, and all post-trial proceedings. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 12/10/2020. (srb)
November 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER FOR ANSWER - It is ORDERED that Respondent shall, not later than December 13, 2020, file an answer responding to the allegations of the habeas petition in which petitioner challenges her continued detention following a removal order. Petitioner may, not later than twenty-one (21) days after the answer is served, file and serve a response to the return of writ. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 11/03/2020. (kpf)
November 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Notation ORDER granting #4 Motion to add a document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 11/3/2020. (MRM)
November 3, 2020 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz: Telephone Status Conference held on 11/3/2020 and participated by Attorneys Karen Bradley and Jade Smarda. (kpf)
November 2, 2020 Filing 4 First MOTION to Add Exhibit I by Petitioner Eva Christian. to dn #1 Petition (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit I Butler County COVID-19 information) (Bradley, Karen) Modified on 11/2/2020 (pb).
October 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER OF REFERENCE - Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), this case is hereby referred to United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz. The Magistrate Judge is authorized to perform any and all functions authorized for full-time United States Magistrate Judges by statute, including, without limiting thegenerality of the foregoing, all motions to remand removed cases to state court, all motions to dismiss or for judgment on the pleadings under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12, and all discovery-related motions. The Magistrate Judge shall proceed in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. The parties are hereby advised of their right to consent to plenary magistrate judge jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 10/30/2020. (kma)
October 30, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jade K Smarda for Defendant Rebecca Adducci (Smarda, Jade)
October 30, 2020 Sealed Document- Sealed matters before this Court may now be accessed by the attorneys of record. As an attorney of record in the captioned case, you have also been granted sealed filing privileges. Documents filed shall follow all current local and federal rules. To access sealed documents and entries, attorneys should log into the system using their respective CM/ECF account. Please contact the Clerk of Courts Office at 937-512-1400 with any questions. (kma)
October 29, 2020 Filing 1 First PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0648-7731320.), filed by Eva Christian. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A Medical information, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B indictment, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C conditions of electronic home detention, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D 6/7/2011 Motion for Release from Electronic Monitoring, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E 6/19/2012 Termination Entry, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F 8/5/2016 Re-sentencing termination entry, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G 9/25/2020 Termination Entry, #8 Exhibit Exhibit H Immigration Judge denial of change in custody) (Bradley, Karen) Modified on 11/2/2020 (pb).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Christian v. Adducci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Eva Christian
Represented By: Karen Denise Bradley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Director ICE Rebecca Adducci
Represented By: Jade K Smarda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?