Armstrong v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
| Richard Armstrong |
| Kathleen Mayo, AT&T Mobility LLC and Spectrum |
| 3:2020cv00477 |
| November 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ENTRY AND ORDER INSTRUCTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO TERMINATE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 12-22-2020. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
|
Filing 2
ENTRY AND ORDER denying without prejudice Plaintiff's #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 12-21-2020. (de)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (The following document(s) were not submitted to the Office of the Clerk: Summons, US Marshal 285 Forms, Civil Cover Sheet) by Plaintiff Richard Armstrong. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Attachment 1, #3 Notes to Attachment 1, #4 Attachment 2, #5 Notes to Attachment 2, #6 Attachment 3, #7 Notes to Attachment 3) (kma) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/17/2020: #8 US Marshal 285 Forms) (kma). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
