Embry v. Simon & Simon PC et al
| John Embry |
| simon & simon PC, Marc Simon, Marc I. Simon and Simon & Simon, PC |
| 3:2020cv00496 |
| December 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Michael J Newman |
| Peter B Silvain |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER (1) DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR NON-PROSECUTION AND (2) TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE DOCKET, signed by Judge Michael J. Newman on 07/01/2021. (bjr)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Peter B. Silvain, Jr. Signed by Judge Michael J. Newman on 05/13/2021. (jmb)
|
| NOTICE: Counsel is advised to review and become familiar with Judge Michael J. Newman's # Standing Order Governing Civil Cases. This Order replaces General Order No. 1201 Dayton in all civil cases before Judge Newman (pb) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Simon & Simon, PC. (srb) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 3/24/2021.. Signed by Judge Michael J. Newman on 3/17/21. (pb)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. #2 )- Now before the Court is a complaint and accompanying application to proceed in forma pauperis. Doc. 2. For good cause shown, Plaintiffs application to proceed without payment of costs and fees is GRANTED. Pursuant to 1915, the Court may dismiss a complaint upon finding (1) the claims are frivolous or malicious; (2) it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or (3) it seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). It is appropriate for the Court to conduct this review sua sponte prior to issuance of process so as to spare prospective defendants the inconvenience and expense of answering such complaints. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 324 (1989). Having conducted this initial review, the Court finds that dismissal under 28 U.S.C. 1915 is not warranted at this stage of the litigation. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Michael J. Newman on 12/16/2020. (kma)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff John Embry. (Li, Hui) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants, filed by John Embry. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Li, Hui) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
