Schmidt v. Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC et al
| Christy Schmidt |
| Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC, Icon Equities, LLC and Atkins & Ogle Law Offices, LC |
| 3:2021cv00134 |
| April 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (pb) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Christy Schmidt (McCraw, Dawn) |
NOTATION ORDER: The Court has received the Notice of Settlement #8 filed by Plaintiff. The Court temporarily stays any pending deadlines in this matter until July 5, 2021. The Court also modifies its 05/19/2021 Order such that Absolute Resolutions Investment, LLC's answer is due on or before July 26, 2021. In the Notice of Settlement, Plaintiff requests that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce settlement. However, the Court will not consider doing so prior to reviewing a settlement agreement executed by the parties. Therefore, if a settlement agreement is executed, then the parties are granted leave until July 5, 2021 either to file said settlement agreement or to email said settlement agreement to the chambers' email address at rose_chambers@ohsd.uscourts.gov (which the Court will then file under seal). Upon the Court's review and consideration of said settlement, the Court will enter a separate notation concerning any request that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 5/20/2021. (de)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement by Plaintiff Christy Schmidt (McCraw, Dawn) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting re #6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, New date requested 6/21/2021. Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC answer due 6/21/2021. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 5-19-2021. (de)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, New date requested 6/21/2021. by Plaintiff Christy Schmidt. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (McCraw, Dawn) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC. Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC served on 4/29/2021, answer due 5/20/2021. (McCraw, Dawn) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Icon Equities, LLC. Icon Equities, LLC served on 5/13/2021, answer due 6/3/2021. (McCraw, Dawn) |
| If this case is referred Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington to be assigned. (ep) |
|
NOTATION ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Dawn McCraw as Co-Counsel. Co-Counsel is directed to register for e-filing through PACER unless they have done so previously. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 05/03/2021. (jmb)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8291184) of Dawn McCraw by Plaintiff Christy Schmidt. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing-AZ) (Cozmyk, Peter) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC, Atkins & Ogle Law Offices, LC and Icon Equities, LLC. (srb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC, Atkins & Ogle Law Offices, LC, Icon Equities, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8288328), filed by Christy Schmidt. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form, #3 Summons Form, #4 Summons Form) (Cozmyk, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
