Pemberton et al v. Krauss
| Lillian Pemberton and Michael Hertenstein |
| Police Officer David Krause and Police Officer David Krauss |
| 3:2021cv00309 |
| November 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Sharon L Ovington |
| Thomas M Rose |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand filed by David Krauss. (Zets, Brian) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. (Olson, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to David Krause. (srb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee of $200 paid, receipt number AOHSDC-8593847) of Christopher S. Olson by Plaintiffs Michael Hertenstein, Lillian Pemberton. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Certificate of Good Standing) (Huth, Michela) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8593832), filed by Lillian Pemberton, Michael Hertenstein. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Form Summons for Clerk to sign) (Huth, Michela) |
NOTATION ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Christopher S. Olson as Co-Counsel. Co-Counsel is directed to register for e-filing through PACER unless they have done so previously. Signed by Judge Thomas M. Rose on 11/16/2021. (srb)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
