McGregor Metalworking Companies v. Lummus Corporation
| McGregor Metalworking Companies |
| Lummus Corporation |
| 3:2021cv00323 |
| December 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Michael J Newman |
| Sharon L Ovington |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 9 U.S.C. ยง 9 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Default Judgment against Lummus Corporation by Plaintiff McGregor Metalworking Companies. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Final Judgment) (Pierce, David) |
| Filing 9 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Defendant, Lummus Corporation. (bjr) |
| Filing 8 Application to Clerk for entry of default against Lummus Corporation . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit of David P. Pierce in Support of Application to Clerk for Entry of Default) (Pierce, David) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Defendant Lummus Corporation. Lummus Corporation served on 12/8/2021, answer due 12/29/2021. (Pierce, David) |
NOTATION ORDER granting #6 Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Leave to File Documents Under Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 12-9-21. (zcc)
|
| Filing 6 Second MOTION to File Document Under Seal RENEWED MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL by Plaintiff McGregor Metalworking Companies. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4) (Pierce, David) |
|
NOTATION ORDER denying without prejudice to renewal #3 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Documents Under Seal. Counsel is directed to comply with Local Rule 7.3. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 12/7/2021. (srb)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Lummus Corporation. (jmb) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons. (Pierce, David) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to File Document Under Seal by Plaintiff McGregor Metalworking Companies. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4) (Pierce, David) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff McGregor Metalworking Companies. (Pierce, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award against Lummus Corporation ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8623055), filed by McGregor Metalworking Companies. (Pierce, David) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/7/2021: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (bjr). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McGregor Metalworking Companies v. Lummus Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: McGregor Metalworking Companies | |
| Represented By: | David Philip Pierce |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lummus Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
