Cincinnati Insurance Company et al v. Andy Rock F.A.S., LLC et al
| Cincinnati Insurance Company and Springfield Museum of Art |
| Andy Rock F.A.S., LLC, Cadogan Tate New York Limited, Dietl International, John Doe(s), Cadogan Tate and Andy Rock Fine Art Services, LLC |
| 3:2021cv00344 |
| December 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Caroline H Gentry |
| Michael J Newman |
| Sharon L Ovington |
| Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. |
| 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff Cincinnati Insurance Company. (Schmidt, Matthew) |
Filing 20
ORDER SETTING A PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE - Rule 26(f) Report due by 3/23/2022. Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 3/30/2022 02:00 PM by Teleconference before Judge Michael J. Newman, to participate, the attorneys for the parties shall call: 1-888-278-0296, enter access code 2725365, security code 123456, and wait for the Court to jointhe conference. Signed by Judge Michael J. Newman on 2/16/2022. (srb)
|
| Filing 19 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendant Andy Rock F.A.S., LLC. (Barton, Joseph) |
| Filing 18 Affirmative Defenses and ANSWER to #9 Amended Complaint filed by Andy Rock F.A.S., LLC. (Rhinehart, Erin) |
| Filing 17 STIPULATION Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Andy Rock F.A.S., LLC. (Rhinehart, Erin) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Russel Barton for Defendant Andy Rock F.A.S., LLC (Barton, Joseph) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Erin Rhinehart for Defendant Andy Rock F.A.S., LLC (Rhinehart, Erin) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens Under Rule 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, to Transfer Venue Under 28 U.SC. 1404(a) #12 by Defendant Dietl International. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Lauren Hartman in Support of Motion) (Mulrane, Kelly) |
| Filing 13 Clerk's Notice of Non-Compliance Local Rule 5.1 (c): The Clerk's Office has reviewed your filing, docket #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens Under Rule 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, to Transfer Venue Under 28 U.SC. 1404(a) filed by Dietl International and it appears that one or more of the PDFs are not text searchable and therefore is not in compliance with Local Rule 5.1 (c). You shall refile docket #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens Under Rule 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, to Transfer Venue Under 28 U.SC. 1404(a) filed by Dietl International as a text searchable document(s), linking the document back to the original entry within 24-hours. Non-Compliance Deadline due by 2/11/2022. (srb) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens Under Rule 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, to Transfer Venue Under 28 U.SC. 1404(a) by Defendant Dietl International. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Lauren Hartman in Support of Motion) (Mulrane, Kelly) Modified on 2/10/2022 to terminate motion, counsel will re-file this motion as a text searchable document(srb). |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #9 Amended Complaint filed by Cadogan Tate. (Pettit, Christopher) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 2/8/22. (jcw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
|
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs First against All Defendants, filed by Cincinnati Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3) (Schmidt, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens Under Rule 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, to Transfer Venue Under 28 U.SC. 1404(a) by Defendant Dietl International. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Lauren Hartman) (Mulrane, Kelly) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #2 Complaint, filed by Cadogan Tate. (Pettit, Christopher) |
| Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Mark P. Estrella as to re #3 Notice by Clerk of Southern District of Ohio Pro Hac Vice Rules as to Attorney. (bjr) |
| Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Michael S. McDaniel as to re #3 Notice by Clerk of Southern District of Ohio Pro Hac Vice Rules as to Attorney. (bjr) |
| Filing 4 STIPULATION to Extend Responsive Pleading Time by Defendant Cadogan Tate New York Limited. (Pettit, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 Notice to Counsel by Clerk of Southern District of Ohio of Pro Hac Vice Rules. (bjr) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Andy Rock F.A.S., LLC, Cadogan Tate New York Limited, Dietl International, and John Doe(s), filed by Cincinnati Insurance Company and Springfield Museum of Art. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B). Originally filed in the Clark County Common Pleas Court on November 23, 2021, under Case No. 21CV345, filed by Cincinnati Insurance Company and Springfield Museum of Art. (bjr) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Clark County Common Pleas Court, case number 21CV0345 ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8653523), filed by Cadogan Tate New York Limited. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint and Documents, #4 Exhibit B - Corporate Disclosure Statement) (Pettit, Christopher) (Attachment 4 replaced on 12/29/2021 by filing counsel to correct clerical error) (bjr). Modified on 12/29/2021 (bjr). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
